Ingredient Spotlight

Muira Puama & Catuaba: Traditional Amazonian Botanicals

Long traditional use in Brazil, with different levels of modern clinical support.

JellyFil® Editorial Team  ·  August 2026  ·  6 min read

⚠️ Affiliate Disclosure: This article contains an affiliate link. If you purchase through our link, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Both botanicals come from the Brazilian Amazon with centuries of traditional use. Here's how their research compares.

Muira Puama: "Potency Wood"

Muira Puama has earned its nickname as a traditional aphrodisiac and nerve tonic. Unlike many botanicals, it has real clinical trial data behind it.

62% reported improved libido

A clinical study of 262 men found 62% reported improved libido after supplementation, with 51% reporting improved erectile function. A follow-up study found 85% reported enhanced desire within just two weeks.

Catuaba: Longer Tradition, Thinner Data

Catuaba has an equally long traditional use in Brazil for stimulating the nervous system and supporting mood and sexual responsiveness. The clinical research base is considerably thinner than Muira Puama's, relying more on traditional use records than large controlled trials.

Why They're Paired

Traditionally combined in Brazilian folk medicine — energy and nervous system support from Catuaba, libido support from Muira Puama — modern formulas that pair them follow that same combination logic.

Both are part of JellyFil®'s formula

See the full nine-ingredient breakdown and supplement facts.

🛒 See the Full Formula →

This guide covers both ingredients from every common search angle: Muira Puama supplement, Muira Puama for male vitality, Catuaba bark supplement, and Catuaba for men — two Amazonian botanicals with a long shared history in traditional male-vitality formulas.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Muira Puama backed by real research?

Yes, clinical studies involving hundreds of men have measured self-reported improvements in libido and erectile function.

Is Catuaba as well-studied?

No, its evidence base is thinner, relying more on traditional use than large controlled trials.